The country is small:

It's less than 10 000 sq km in area, has fewer than 1 million people, and GDP less than about US$50 billion. It might have a coast. It's a liberal democracy, or at least mostly a liberal democracy. It's been independent for almost 100 years, attempts a strong neutrality, and is thus generally non-aligned.

I suppose the country's currency is hard, or reasonably hard, enough that it can be freely exchanged.

In this country you can bring a gym bag with US$1 million (say 10 000 $100 bills) in or out of the country. There are banks there which you can deposit the money, and while they might be required to report this to the government, the government won't tell the governments or other international organizations about it.

What would be the consequences for such in international relations?

Thank you.

​

​

Edit (probably over 20 minutes after posting):

However, I should have added, that this generally occurred between 1998 and 2004.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 2 points 5 hours ago (5 children)

As I've replied elsewhere ITT:

I’m thinking that their currency is pegged to a basket, which includes gold, silver, USDs, €, £, ¥, and Swiss francs.

​

I'm not quite sure how banks work.

Like if a bank takes the gym bag full of money, what do they do with the US$1 million. Do they put it in a vault with perhaps US$100s of millions, as well as also those of extra currencies?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

    When you deposit physical cash at a bank, the bank accepts the money, and records that in its books to show that your account has a higher balance. The account balance itself is your asset, and the bank's liability. So when you have an account balance of $1000, that's the bank owing you $1000, that they have to pay you at any time, on demand. They can pay it to you with physical currency, if you show up to the bank and say you want to withdraw the balance in cash. Or they can honor your demand to pay someone else on your behalf (through a paper check, electronic funds transfer, etc.).

    Like if a bank takes the gym bag full of money, what do they do with the US$1 million

    They can hold onto it, or deposit it somewhere else, in exchange for their own balance with some other financial institution.

    The overwhelming majority of money in the modern system isn't physical. It's just records in a ledger: paper in the days of paper records, or digital records in the modern banking world. So although physical cash can move around, on the back end, the banks are mostly dealing with each other in updated ledgers, not physically moving physical currency. I might have a credit card account and a checking account with a bank, and I spend with my card in a way that increases the balance of the credit card, and then use my checking account to pay my credit card balance, and then all that gets resolved without any physical currency changing hands. Including with the merchant, who might accept credit card payments electronically, and then pay their employees through electronic payments as well.

    Currency exchange is done by supply and demand. A small country with its own small economy and a floating currency is going to be vulnerable to swings in foreign exchange rates, so that country will likely need to hold a lot of reserves to shore up their own currency value, knowing that they have the foreign currency and gold to be able to trade it for their own currency, and keep the supply and demand for their own currency from completely swinging the value back and forth.

    So if it's a country that just uses dollars, and someone shows up with a bunch of dollars, their deposit helps shore up that bank's own reserves of physical cash. Or if someone comes in with an electronic transfer of dollars to their account in the bank, that bank now has a higher balance of dollars on its records (recognized by the other financial institutions).

    Adding a currency exchange component to this whole thing sounds like an unnecessarily complicated side quest, if you're just trying to tell a story.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 4 hours ago (3 children)

    Okay and thank you for your reply.

    Having their own currency is a pride thing. Having it pegged is a concession to the need to have it backed, but pegged to a basket means they aren't totally financially beholden to anyone bigger than the country.

    They also have notes that are worth more than US$1000: one might not need a gym bag of US bills when it could be replaced with a fanny pack of the country's currency.

    The amount of money the US has is, IIUC, slightly over $2 trillion. This country's currency probably totals to less than 1% of that.

    As it is, I imagine the bank would do with the dollars as you've described.

    The thing is, some US regulators, bureaucrats, and politicians—maybe some from the FBI, DEA, and a few other agencies—as well as those of other countries who have their own drug warriors, would want to inhibit such transactions.

    I can easily imagine that they might push their banks to not deal with these types of banks in my fictional country, perhaps none of the banks or other financial institutions in that country, until that country changes the laws and gets in line.

    With the Russian-Ukrainian war these past few years, I've been hearing about sanctions against Russia and some Russian YouTubers are talking about how hard it is to get money back to their relatives. Presumably Russia deals with partially this by maintaining a banking system in Russia where people in, say, Saint Petersburg and Vladivostok, could exchange money, including electronically, and as some countries still trade with Russia, transfers between these cities and, say, Belgrade, Brasilia, and Beijing (hey 3 "B"s!), might be similarly easy.

    Some of these countries might not be too concern with this country allowing the aforementioned drug laundering because they control their own drug trade with repression. Idk.

    I wonder if these would happen, and by how much, and how my fictitious country would cope with such.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 hours ago (2 children)

    The amount of money the US has is, IIUC, slightly over $2 trillion.

    About $5.5 trillion. Which, through banking, is multiplied as a money supply of about $23 trillion.

    Honestly, my take is that you shouldn't get into the weeds of foreign currency exchange, money supply, etc., in a fictional work unless you already have a strong grasp of the concepts involved. I personally don't, just some macroeconomics coursework decades ago in college, but I know just enough to see when things don't look right. If the plot allows for you to hand wave away how it works, you can just model things after existing banking havens throughout post-Bretton-Woods history.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 hours ago (1 child)

    I mostly agree

    However, in my story—as I presently have it—at least one of my characters—and a possible protagonist—lives in the US as an illegal alien, builds a drug empire (mostly marijuana, nor is he violent—he's not a Vito or Michael Corelone, Tony Montana, or that guy in Breaking Bad), and then he, if you will, between 1998 to 2004, "cashes out" by laundering his money—in the $100s of millions—in varying banks, perhaps those of this country, and assumes a new life as a citizen there, somewhat of a playboy, who spends most of his time in the country, while running legitimate businesses he bought or started there. He then rarely, if ever, goes to the US.

    Would this be possible for him in this country as the US and others continue their war on drugs?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 hour ago*

    Just hand wave away the "how," if your story is about the person rather than about the laundering techniques. Just say that he has been laundering money and finally built up enough legitimate-seeming wealth that he can hold overseas.

    Not every story needs to have an Andy Weir style explanation of the nuts and bolts of how each step progresses. Unless that's what you want to do, in which case you better start consulting people who really know this stuff.

  • source
  • parent