I don't really think it's useful to describe ourselves based on 20th century movements. I don't describe myself as an anarchist, nor would I describe myself as an M-L.

The material conditions of 2026 are not the same as 1926, so our strategies and understanding should be based on our current material conditions. We can learn from anarchist and communist writers alike, and we should apply that knowledge based on our current reality instead of dogmatically sticking to past decisions that don't necessarily make sense under our material conditions.

If you want to sling totally-not-an-insults, every time I've interacted with you, I come away from it asking if you have ever even read any anarchist theory whatsoever, not to mention communist theory. I question whether you even read the articles you comment under or the news related to subjects you bring up. A few days ago, you mentioned Rojava aspirationally and I wondered if you perhaps haven't followed any of the news related to that project in the last year or more. No disrespect, just wondering.