you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 2 days ago (1 child)

it wasn’t but we’ll move on

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 days ago

    Let's not. I'd like you to tell me what I got wrong. I described the output of LLMs as "a bunch of pablum [which means 'trite, insipid, or simplistic writing or speech'] that sounds convincing and sycophantic[.]"

    So do you want studies that show they product pablum, studies that show their output sounds plausible and convincing even when it's wrong, or studies that show they're trained for sycophancy?

  • source
  • parent