This is no caricature and to scale. Guess which one of the two vehicles is not available in the US and which one is not available in the EU.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 10 hours ago (5 children)

Capital serving fragile egos

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

    Capital only serves capital. If small cars made more money they’d push them in their advertising and there would be more available.

    Capital used regulatory capture to make large, profitable vehicles more available, then sold people on the idea that they needed one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 hours ago (3 children)

    Small cars are dangerous because larger cars can crush them.

    This is the legitimately the logic.

    The world is an insane asylum.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 child)

    Small cars are dangerous because larger cars can crush them.

    That's true in a world of cars, not in one for people though where the driver of the small car sees you and might hurt you if they screw up while the driver of that big ass pseudo-tank(*) just kills you without having ever realized you were there.

    (*)scrap that: actual tanks have better visibility than those idiotic US trucks never hauling anything...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment