you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 1 hour ago (1 child)

I disagree with the presumption that code is a means to an ends. That axiom assumes that having "ends" at all is valid and beyond reproach.

What do we really need in life? Why must the code provide a utility to us. The same is true of every discipline.

As a community, as a society, we can determine what problem areas we must consider "utilitarian" and what we don't. Capitalism, neoliberalism, these ideologies take utility as the given end goal for an entire society and all of it's facets. Everything must be sacrificed in the name of line-go-up.

My chief argument is that at this point 90% of daily human needs are met, in excess, by the tools and systems we already have. AI provides utility, certainly, but why should I want it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago

    Definitely agree with a lot of that. Indeed in this era of abundance why do we need to squeeze more and more out of everything.

    However computing has been one of the most valuable inventions of all time. A script is usually written to automate a process. If the script doesn't work, it's useless. Not all disciplines are the same. The value of the code is what it does.

    You can certainly talk about the horrors of AI under capitalism but i don't think open source developers should have to think about it. I'd rather they make software better for everyone than get tied up thinking about how to solve the impossible.

  • source
  • parent