you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 20 points 10 hours ago (5 children)

"does more, costs less" was a slogan they used in their ads in the 90s: for example

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

    Oh interesting!

    But funnily enough these ads didn't air where I grew up and Apple was never even close to the price of a non-Apple PC

    Oh and: Apple, you've sold PCs as well! Just because you picked up a cat and put stripes on it you couldn't just proclaim "look, a tiger!". But then again ... You could. And you did. And in still furious that people bought it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 hours ago* (3 children)

    tbh, didn’t PC have a more strict definition back then?* specifically, an IBM PC compatible? so, intel processor + DOS (and later OS/2 or windows), which isn’t what apple sold

    *(genuinely asking, i was not around in the 90s 😅)

    (tho i guess even by that definition, intel macs were PCs lol, but that was way later)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 hours ago* (1 child)

    the two definitions (general Personal Computer, or IBM-compatible) always co-existed in different contexts.

    aside - even though Apple ads really drove the Macs Vs PCs thing - before they went Intel, Apple computers used to have IBM PowerPC architecture processors.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 hours ago

    You know that's another good point, while I was around then and even had a computer back then I'm from a non English country and just learned "PC == personal computer". It never occurred to me that Apple might have reacted to a US terms or definition up until this very moment it was always "they just wanna be different and fancy".

    Perhaps a USA person my age bracket can give insights!

  • source
  • parent