you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 20 hours ago* (1 child)

"If flywheels seem like an exotic energy storage solution, that’s largely because they have generally been relegated to niche applications. A spokesperson for Qnetic told pv magazine USA that grid-connected flywheel pioneer Beacon Power deployed 400 of its 100 kW (25 kWh) units at two utility sites in New York and Pennsylvania between 2011 and 2014 to provide fast-responding frequency regulation. Each location had 200 units with a nameplate capacity of 20 MW (5 MWh), and both are still providing frequency regulation service and generating revenue."

I would assume that flywheels are exotic because their niche (short- to mid-term storage, quick reaction times) wasn't much needed so far in a grid dominated by non-renewables. This will probably change in the future.

But for the same reason I don't get all that talk about competing with lithium-ion batteries. Flywheels don't really fit the same category as batteries. And lithium-ion batteries in particular are not well suited for grid-level storage anyway. Their benefit at the moment is basically just availability because that's the type of battery that was produced and optimised at scale for –at least– the last decade.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 17 hours ago

    Agree with the "compete with lithium-ion" being weird. The biggest advantage of lithium-based batteries in general is the low weight of lithium providing a good power-weight ratio. For static installations like grid storage that should be mostly irrelevant. As you say, they are used currently because that's the only battery technology that is widely produced for decades.

    While sodium battery tech is taking off, I am surprised that other alternatives like Nickel-Iron ("Edison") batteries and supercapacitors aren't used more for grid storage. Supercapacitors don't hold charge for long, but long enough to charge during daylight and discharge in the early evening when the demand-supply gap is lowest. Their size and weight shouldn't matter much for a static installation. Nickel-Iron batteries are heavy and need occasional topping up of electrolyte, but again those should be minor issues for a static installation.

    Reminder that control of the patents for large-scale many-cycled NiMh batteries were bought by GM in 1994 then Texaco / Chevron in 2000; Chevron have refused to sell or licence the technology, preventing it from being used for anything other than AA and AAA batteries.

  • source
  • parent