you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 15 points 3 days ago (3 children)

change my mind

Sadly, he does seem to have gotten it trademarked. That LLC owns a "Mug Club" which I presume is Crowder's.

How this was trademarked, I have no idea, but if it's used satirically (as in thrown back in his face) I don't see how a lawsuit prevails - generally this is only merited if CNN started using it directly for a personality on their network or a show name, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 days ago

    That's insane. It's just a basic concept of debate. An extremely generic phrase. It's like trademarking "haha". I suspect it will be tested more thoroughly in court than at the trademark office.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago

    I don't see how it prevails regardless. It's generic when used for a debate, no reasonable consumer would assume it was a brand indicator at all, and even if they did no reasonable consumer would assume this debate was signed off on by him.

  • source
  • parent