you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 22 points 3 days ago (19 children)

Protesting is fine. Destroying beautiful places like this is a serious loss

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 3 days ago (9 children)

    You have no idea what protest is about then. When you have nothing and capital is entirely owned by someone else, you can burn your city and lose nothing. Peaceful protests are by definition useless and only Americans think it works.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 days ago

    Exactly, pointless conserving if you have nothing to conserve.

    Secondly gov's, everywhere has shut down the avenues and options to complaint and peaceful protest have been minimised to stuff like fill in an online petition. Its not even appeasement at this stage. They have ignored the voice of reason, so that voice is now back and looking to burn everything to the ground to get attention.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 3 days ago

    Go burn the mansions of the billionaires then, sink their yachts. Why burn down your own history? It's like shooting yourself in the foot because you are mad. How the hell does that change anything?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    In our defense, Americans are only TAUGHT that peaceful protest is the only viable way.

    Our schools don't teach about the Battle of Blair Mountain, or Haymarket Square, or the Deacons for Defense, etc. etc. etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago (1 child)

    I'm sure it has to do with your education but I find it dangerous how it makes the average american allergic to non-cosmetic protests.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago (3 children)

    Peaceful protests are by definition useless and only Americans think it works.

    Hell no? Nonviolence—properly planned, properly utilized nonviolence in the appropriate conditions—does work. The classic (good) examples here are Gandhi and MLK, but they're are far from the only ones. What doesn't work is American style cargo cult "protests" that reproduce the appearance of protest without having an actual theory of victory. This article does a great job explaining this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    2 examples that only worked thanks to being the alternative to other violent movements. Gandhi in particular also got a lot of people killed in his "peaceful" crusade, and did nothing about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago

    I mean diversity of tactics is important; in practice many successful movements are going to have violent and peaceful wings (or one wing that does both, e.g. the US labor movement), both of which meaningfully contribute to the end result. That doesn't mean the peaceful wing is useless or toothless; peaceful movements have options for escalation up to and including a general strike.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 3 days ago (8 children)

    Do not fuck with your citizens then

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 days ago (4 children)

    I mean ultimately destroying useful government property doesn't punish the government, because it's going to be rebuilt/replaced out of taxpayer money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    You really don't understand the French.

    If they raise taxes because of this, the next one will burn as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments