Hi, I'm a lemmy.ml admin. The one mod of this community has been inactive for years so i'm filling in here.

I just removed a bunch of posts linking to brand-new (ranging from days-to-months-old) Debian derivatives.

Expanding on what I wrote in a PM to the person who posted these:

i am quite certain that most of these distros are not things which should be recommended to anyone. the barrier to entry with LLMs has gotten so low, anyone can make a garbage distro which they'll soon abandon, and worse anyone can also make malware with a shiny website and write posts on a bunch of blogs to entice people to try it.

getting even a few users to try it could be quite lucrative: when someone boots a malicious iso it can pillage their disk.

so, I propose that, going forward people should not post links to new Debian derivatives here if they are not providing at least either a personal or 3rd-party endorsement of the credibility of the project.

if anyone (with a substantial good-judgment-indicating posting or commenting history) wants to be made a mod of this community, let me know.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 2 points 4 days ago

I wouldn’t mind moderating

Thanks! It would be nice if some user(s) of debian itself would do it also but this is a start :)

Given how much worse Ubuntu has gotten in recent years maybe you'll find yourself switching to Debian soon enough anyway 😉

imo posts about lesser-known debian derivatives should be allowed here... but as i said earlier either the poster or a 3rd party source they're linking to should make a good case for why it is actually interesting and/or credible.

  • source
  • parent