Reading the comments I’m surprised how many people don’t know about them.

It might be less about not knowing about gender disparity, and more about wanting to get rid of that too.

• global retirement age is bullshit anyway; tell me that someone that worked 50 years in a coal mine (and survived somehow) should retire at the same age that someone that worked in an office. Gender is not needed there
• mandatory conscription is already a dicy subject; if one assume it makes sense, making it men-only doesn't. No need for gender disparity here either; plenty of military roles that can be done without being a beefcake
• many countries are actually looking into extending paternal leaves because they finally got that both parents are important to raise a child
• physical requirements should be physical requirements. If they exist, they should match the job requirements. Having different bar of entry because of gender makes no sense. If the job is lifting iron all day, and you can lift iron all day, that's all that matters.
• parity requirements related to gender exists to curb all the disparity that's ingrained in society because we decided to make men and women a different thing. remove the difference, remove the need to "make amend with a mandatory quota"
• same as previous point
• and same as previous previous point

The only need to keep distinguishing gender for legal stuff is because we keep the "women are lesser than men" mentality, coupled with "women needs protection".

Guess what: there isn't a gender that is "less" than the other, and everyone needs protection. Sounds like an equality thing to me, where genders only get in the way.