Idk why you're getting so offended. I never implied you or anyone here was AI, just the Twitter post in the screenshot.
I also said the techniques mentioned are legit and common. I'm even guilty of some AI favorites myself (em dashes, false ranges, etc.). That's kind of the point -- AI is trained to emulate human language.
The thing is, they're also heavily post-trained to reward "interesting" or faux-profound rhetorical tricks that impress human graders. This encourages them to overuse such techniques, even when they don't make much sense. It's like those old Cola Wars taste tests where people preferred a sip of Pepsi because it tasted sweeter on the spot, but it becomes cloying and saccharine over a whole can. Default AI prose reads like it's trying to twist every single sentence into some kind of surprise or artful flourish, and usually the same few kinds over and over and over again. Seeing those well-worn patterns, combined with the pretty questionable understanding of normal human behavior, makes it pretty clear what's going on.
FWIW, your comments don't read like AI at all. I do agree there's a frustrating epidemic of such accusations, especially from people who don't understand good writing lobbing it at people who are capable of putting more than one clause in a sentence. But I'm being sincere when I say that this has very specific and characteristic traits of a particular AI model that I've seen a lot, not just "it's long and well-written so it MUST be fake."