One strength : we can do it in groups.

One weakness : uses models.


What's up with the downvotes. Did I accidentally contradict a dogma?


Ok, allow me to explicitly state the popular belief that I seem to be contradicting here.

Science is perfect. It has no weaknesses.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 0 points 12 hours ago* (2 children)

But what is established (a model) and the evidence (observed phenomena) are qualitatively differ. Extremely so. So there is that vast loss in the translation.

One sketches a banana and, examining the sketch, concludes that bananas are 2d.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 12 hours ago (1 child)
  • [–] [S] 0 points 12 hours ago

    It's a metaphor. It illustrates the failing of models. Consider how your models might similarly fail. But beyond that detail, the fact remains, in the translation from observation to model there is a world of loss.

    One cannot eat the word "banana" and gain nutrition, after all. I think we can agree on that.

    And look how this conversation has digressed from a listing of science's strengths and weaknesses into a defense of science and a trouncing of the unbeliever. Emotional. Unattractive.

  • source
  • parent