▲ 118 ▼ OpenAI paid $300 for a bug that gave away its paid models (www.startuphub.ai) submitted 2 weeks ago by themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world 14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] xelar@lemmy.ml 33 points 2 weeks ago (6 children) Wht would anybody help big corporations as an non employee? permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 44 points 2 weeks ago (2 children) Hackers like to hack. Bug bounties can be lucrative, but they are also a way to indulge in the joy of hacking without worrying about legal ramifications. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) This is it right here. Skullduggery is fun on an intellectual level but I have enough problems without Johnny Law on my ass. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 7 points 2 weeks ago It's easy to forget the mass panic around hackers in the 80s and 90s! It wasn't a letter from your ISP telling you to cut that shit out (pirating). Kevin Mitnick got sentenced to a year in jail accessing an internal network of a company, and transferring the source code of their software. As far as I understand he didn't extort the company, threaten them, or release the files. The hack was in 1979 and he was charged in 1988. The Free Kevin movement in the late 90s (for his later arrest) really created this environment where people pushing back on how blown out of proportion the criminal charges were helped popularize the idea of white hat hacking. If I recall correctly it started as individuals advertising their services for pen testing, etc, and approaching companies with their discoveries hoping for a pay out. I'm sure the big bounty system was just a more efficient way for companies to get this same service without having to hire someone do the testing. They only pay for results. The benefit to the hacker is there is much less risk of being accused of blackmail or hit with charges for admitting to the hack if they cold-approach a company. permalink fedilink source parent [–] zip@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 2 weeks ago Poverty and desperation for money, maybe? To pay rent/utilities/for food/needed medical care, etc. Who knows for sure, but that was the first thing to pop into my head. My broke, disabled ass may just be projecting, haha. permalink fedilink source parent [–] naught101@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago Because they pay significantly more than $300 permalink fedilink source parent [+] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de -8 points 2 weeks ago Greed permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 44 points 2 weeks ago (2 children) Hackers like to hack. Bug bounties can be lucrative, but they are also a way to indulge in the joy of hacking without worrying about legal ramifications. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) This is it right here. Skullduggery is fun on an intellectual level but I have enough problems without Johnny Law on my ass. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 7 points 2 weeks ago It's easy to forget the mass panic around hackers in the 80s and 90s! It wasn't a letter from your ISP telling you to cut that shit out (pirating). Kevin Mitnick got sentenced to a year in jail accessing an internal network of a company, and transferring the source code of their software. As far as I understand he didn't extort the company, threaten them, or release the files. The hack was in 1979 and he was charged in 1988. The Free Kevin movement in the late 90s (for his later arrest) really created this environment where people pushing back on how blown out of proportion the criminal charges were helped popularize the idea of white hat hacking. If I recall correctly it started as individuals advertising their services for pen testing, etc, and approaching companies with their discoveries hoping for a pay out. I'm sure the big bounty system was just a more efficient way for companies to get this same service without having to hire someone do the testing. They only pay for results. The benefit to the hacker is there is much less risk of being accused of blackmail or hit with charges for admitting to the hack if they cold-approach a company. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) This is it right here. Skullduggery is fun on an intellectual level but I have enough problems without Johnny Law on my ass. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 7 points 2 weeks ago It's easy to forget the mass panic around hackers in the 80s and 90s! It wasn't a letter from your ISP telling you to cut that shit out (pirating). Kevin Mitnick got sentenced to a year in jail accessing an internal network of a company, and transferring the source code of their software. As far as I understand he didn't extort the company, threaten them, or release the files. The hack was in 1979 and he was charged in 1988. The Free Kevin movement in the late 90s (for his later arrest) really created this environment where people pushing back on how blown out of proportion the criminal charges were helped popularize the idea of white hat hacking. If I recall correctly it started as individuals advertising their services for pen testing, etc, and approaching companies with their discoveries hoping for a pay out. I'm sure the big bounty system was just a more efficient way for companies to get this same service without having to hire someone do the testing. They only pay for results. The benefit to the hacker is there is much less risk of being accused of blackmail or hit with charges for admitting to the hack if they cold-approach a company. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 7 points 2 weeks ago It's easy to forget the mass panic around hackers in the 80s and 90s! It wasn't a letter from your ISP telling you to cut that shit out (pirating). Kevin Mitnick got sentenced to a year in jail accessing an internal network of a company, and transferring the source code of their software. As far as I understand he didn't extort the company, threaten them, or release the files. The hack was in 1979 and he was charged in 1988. The Free Kevin movement in the late 90s (for his later arrest) really created this environment where people pushing back on how blown out of proportion the criminal charges were helped popularize the idea of white hat hacking. If I recall correctly it started as individuals advertising their services for pen testing, etc, and approaching companies with their discoveries hoping for a pay out. I'm sure the big bounty system was just a more efficient way for companies to get this same service without having to hire someone do the testing. They only pay for results. The benefit to the hacker is there is much less risk of being accused of blackmail or hit with charges for admitting to the hack if they cold-approach a company. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zip@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 2 weeks ago Poverty and desperation for money, maybe? To pay rent/utilities/for food/needed medical care, etc. Who knows for sure, but that was the first thing to pop into my head. My broke, disabled ass may just be projecting, haha. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] naught101@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago Because they pay significantly more than $300 permalink fedilink source parent