But seriously what kind of predatory policy is that in the first place?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 child)

I'm not saying it was illegal or anything, just that they probably make a lot of money turning on the KYC after big wins. They'll never do one to a losing customer.

In that sense, I do believe it's a bit tricky.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 5 hours ago

    Hmm...

    I'd wager KYC applies either way (anyone placing a bet should be known, not just who ends up winning) and not paying out wins is a clear breach of contract.

    So very clearly doubly illegal. First they let any rando gamble, and then they don't pay out wins.

  • source
  • parent