you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Except they all are spying on us and we all know it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 22 hours ago (6 children)

    But I asked what makes this spying

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 22 hours ago (5 children)

    I am saying we already know they are all spying. So while this humour might not quite fit, it's still just one step removed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 22 hours ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 22 hours ago (3 children)

    All the cumulative information just got fed into LLM models through data brokers that have a record of everything you every said, combined with everything else. So, not really meh, so much as an existential risk, as LLM's are not AI and won't stop failing, can be used for repression quite well if not entirely accurately.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 21 hours ago (2 children)

    "meh" to the sentiment that a meme/message/whatever doesn't need to be accurate as long as you agree with the sentiment. Lots of people believe a lot of utter lies because of that attitude.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 21 hours ago (1 child)

    But it is kind of spying, they are sharing it with 1,300 paying clients. That can then do whatever with it.

    Do they spy more elsewhere? Yes, does that mean this isn't spying, not necessarily. I don't think you made the case for why this doesn't qualify either.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 21 hours ago

    Detecting that your client failed to load an ad, and displaying a message attributing that to an ad-blocker, is not, in my book, anything like "spying". What else the website gets up to is not relevant to whether that is spying, which is what the original post said.

  • source
  • parent