I am just curious about people’s taste here, since this community looks sane compared to other “loony-toons” gaming subs or forums online.

You don’t need to explain yourself just name them.

Thanks

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 6 hours ago (2 children)

Its not for everyone but I disagree that it doesn't hold up today.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 hours ago* (1 child)

    I’m curious, what holds up? The gameplay is dated, guns don’t feel particularly good, level design isn’t anything special, graphics are merely typical for the day, and you’re railroaded on the storyline so IMO nothing feels that impactful. When the only way to progress the level is to commit a war crime, and then I’m supposed to feel bad about it as if there was an alternative, it just sucks.

    I can see how in its era, for console gamers, it was unique. I was very underwhelmed when I got around to playing it a couple years ago. IMO, it didn’t really say anything new and it didn’t do it in a particularly compelling or innovative matter.

    Just one person’s opinion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 hours ago

    When the only way to progress the level is to commit a war crime, and then I’m supposed to feel bad about it as if there was an alternative, it just sucks.

    This feels a lot like saying "books can't have an emotional impact, you just read the words in the order they were written".

  • source
  • parent