this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
151 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37705 readers
113 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s your job to prove your assertion that we know enough about cognition to make reasonable comparisons.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

May as well ask me to prove that we know enough about calculators to say they won't develop sentience while I'm at it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except calculators aren't models capable of understanding language that appear to become more and more capable as they grow. It's nothing like that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't it, though? Take two cells and rub them together, do it a bit more, boom here we are on Lemmy.

We wouldn't refer to our consciousness as an emergent property of algae.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, but we would refer to our consciousness as an emergent property of our brain.

And we're trying to build artificial brains.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Sorry, I guess what I was trying to say is that it doesn't take much to get from "calculator" to a system that is Turing complete, and from there we're just a few sleeps away from LLMs, and from there...