I'm pondering a move, and I'm interested in what things people like and what factors y'all consider important.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

There is no such thing. What's better for one person will be worse for another. In general, the less developed an area is, the more affordable it is for the working class. However, that comes with the trade off of fewer services, self-reliance by necessity, not much to do, and lower education standards. The US is generally a capitalist hellscape for the lower classes. You have to be very realistic about whether you can afford to live in the nicer cities, and also realistic about the dangers and lower of quality of life if you choose to live in a poor area in an economically stratified city.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

    This. I was gonna suggest Los Angeles, but I happened to move there at a time that the cost of living was great, I lucked into a nice place in a rent-controlled part of town on the west side, and I had a decent income. But the situation could very easily be much worse now or in different circumstances. I definitely would NOT move to LA without a job, without friends to fall back on.

    Likewise, when I lived in Pittsburgh the cost of living was also really good, but idk about now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 hours ago* (2 children)

    LA is probably bad, because of the traffic in the city

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 47 minutes ago

    Controversial opinion but LA traffic is less bad than many cities because the average driver is more skilled.

    Like, LA traffic is bad, but you’re much more likely to get in a car crash in Boston, if that makes sense. NYC drivers are much more pointlessly aggressive, LA drivers understand traffic flows better.

  • source
  • parent