840
Because what could possibly go wrong with this quality-of-life upgrade? (thelemmy.club)
submitted 4 days ago by to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
197 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Aren't we the same though? We don't really know anything until we learn or train ourselves with knowledge? It's just that LLMs only do this per prompt.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    Yesn't. What LLMs lack and causes these idiotic suggestions is context from mediums other than language. If you get down to it humans talking are also just trying to predict what should come next, but we predict this from more input than just text. Particularly with something like design, we come up with the design and then the text and maybe concept art to describe it. The llm comes up with a description that seems likely and then feeds it to a diffusion model to make an image to go with the text.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 3 days ago

    Basically, the problem is input, but AFAIK a lot of AIs now are multi modal. Yes they can make up stuff but if you steer it to the right direction with proper context or inputs, it can help build. Maybe what you're talking about is AIs can't choose rather than think. They can think. Albeit, they can't choose only because of the guardrails. So, you are the user chooses to steer it to what you want

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 3 days ago

    LLMs can be multimodal now. You can chuck a screenshot into claude code or whatever you use and the image generation process can also be done by the LLM itself rather than an external tool call as far as I know

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent