With the ever-ongoing ‘progress’ of the proposed UK nuclear power plants, I wonder if this is the best course of action (not just in the UK, but across other nations also)?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 3 days ago (1 child)

Nuclear was probably the best choice in the 1970’s; France made the best choice. But we’ve seen over and over again the problems are getting worse rather than better. Paperwork and process ever more unwieldy. Construction taking longer and longer. Radioactive waste building up with no permanent disposal. By far the highest cost power generation, and the difference is getting wider.

Much of the posts about how great it will be this time is just astroturfing by those trying to profit. No, “small modular reactors”, didn’t solve the cost, construction, or process issues, but only raised the cost of generation. No, thorium isn’t the silver bullet and really doesn’t exist yet.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago*

    Paperwork and process ever more unwieldy. Construction taking longer and longer.

    Not with SMRs and portable reactors. Ontario will have 4 online with 6 years lead time. Fraction of the cost and time of a full CANDU build. Thorium is as real as the Stark arc reactor or fusion.

  • source
  • parent