you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 208 points 3 days ago (16 children)

ICE has been quietly firing some of the roughly 12,000 officers it hired during its 2025 rapid expansion, citing background red flags that former DHS officials say should have been caught before hiring and because of poor performance.

A whistleblower told the DHS Office of Inspector General in August 2025 that final job offers were being issued before fingerprint, identity, and credit checks were completed, and that some recruits began training or duty while investigations were still open

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 122 points 3 days ago (8 children)

    I shudder at the thought of what "poor performance" means at ICE. Not enough arrests? Not enough tasered people?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 67 points 3 days ago

    Probably more like tasering people while being filmed. As long as it's off camera it never happened.

    And as funny as it sounds, it's probably true. They have been told to be brutal, just don't end up on the evening news beside a dead body.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 child)

    In this admin poor performance could also mean not being harsh enough.

    There never was ask for competency, trump fires like for not being loyal enough.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 3 days ago

    A few months ago, I asked Lemmy how much I could expect to make if I went through ICE training, and quit immediately before my first operational deployment. I'd bet I wasn't the only one to contemplate such a scam.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 days ago

    Probably paperwork issues that delay full depotions. I could see the courts full of wrongfully arrest lawsuits because there US citazen paperwork was available but not filed correctly. It comes with the arrest now ask questions later mentality.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 53 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    Please tell us you have a source for this, that is awesome

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 3 days ago

    The source has already been posted, but I remember a journalist reporting that she applied to ice and they hired her immediately without doing any background research and after she had responded saying she had recanted her application

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 46 points 3 days ago*

    Not surprising given what we've seen reported: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2026/01/ice-recruitment-minneapolis-shooting.html

    spoiler/quoteSomehow, despite never submitting any of the paperwork they sent me—not the background check or identification info, not the domestic violence affidavit, none of it—ICE had apparently offered me a job.

    According to the application portal, my pre-employment activities remained pending. And yet, it also showed that I had accepted a final job offer and that my onboarding status was “EOD”—Entered On Duty, the start of an enlistment period. I moused over the exclamation mark next to “Onboarding” and a helpful pop-up appeared. “Your EOD has occurred. Welcome to ICE!”

    I clicked through to my application tracking page. They’d sent my final offer on Sept. 30, it said, and I had allegedly accepted. “Welcome to Ice. … Your duty location is New York, New York. Your EOD was on Tuesday, September 30th, 2025.”

    By all appearances, I was a deportation officer. Without a single signature on agency paperwork, ICE had officially hired me.

    Perhaps, if I’d accepted, they would have demanded my pre-employment paperwork, done a basic screening, realized their mistake, and fired me immediately. And yet, the pending and upcoming tasks list suggested a very different outcome. My physical fitness test had been initiated on Oct. 6, it said: three days in the future. My medical check had apparently been completed on Oct. 6.

  • source
  • parent