God save me from people who lose all conversational context with only one level of abstraction. Your own first comment's claim was, and I quote: "the expectation for you to know exactly what will happen when you ingest it is completely reasonable.".
Weevil made a counterpoint, which I thought was poor.
You pointed out that their counterpoint was poor. "Try again"
I said "I'll try for them". I gave a counterpoint demonstrating that your original assertion was unfounded and the expectation is not reasonable, because each person's neurochemistry is different, and psychoactive drugs are renowned for having unpredictable effects for that reason.
Then, you pulled a non-sequitur strawman out of your ass about "kill rates"
I made the mistake of engaging with someone clearly responding in bad faith (or at least total confusion), and pointed out why the kill rate angle is also bullshit.
You claimed not to care, and that you didn't ask for any of this.
I pointed out that, in fact, you did ask for this.
Clearly you are so baked out of your gourd that you don't even remember why you commented in the first place, though I suppose I should have expected as much from your username. We done?
(If not, I am happy to provide you with the original context of why I talked about "googling it", which seemed to confuse you as well.)