I recently got into a debate with a friend who swears is "Against AI Slop", but uses AI for 90% of his researching stuff. When i point it out, i got a 20 minute rant about how AI helps him learn and makes him learn faster, but i see massive issues with this. For once, using AI even as a starting point is a gamble, if not a straight damage to the learning process as a whole, mainly because sloppified information spit out by an LLM is often simplified, imprecise and oversimplified. For example, he told me to be interested in Arch Linux, but said the Arch Wiki was too "difficult to understand and took knowledge for granted" and told me that AI helped him understanding it. However i think that the wiki being verbose and designed to not be understandable by everybody is a filter to make sure that you don't go and use Arch if you can't understand the wiki, not for gatekeeping, but because a sloppified and short version of processes explained in the wiki will result in you knowing WHAT to do, but often not HOW and WHY. Also, it keeps you locked to AI since if you get used to the simplification (and often misinformation) given by the slop generator, it'll be hard to understand the real sources, and it'll be hard to learn the jargon and will lead to an incomplete result. I could go on for days and feel free to debate me, but I am tired of pretending that AI is a great learning tool. It can be, but in its current status it's just not, and when it can be, IMO the other cons that come with AI usage outweigh the possible value of the info.
As a tool for learning Linux AI is fantastic. I'm going to have to disagree with you there.
Example: You get an error. You don't understand it or how to fix it. You copy and paste the error into Google: The answer you seek is probably on the 5th page after all the SEO bullshit. You copy and paste the error into Gemini, ChatGPT, Claude, etc and you get immediate details and possibly the exact answer you're looking for. Not only that, but if you still don't understand you can ask it further questions and have it clarify and that actually works really well.
IMHO, you're conflating "AI slop" aka "AI output, generated with as little effort as possible to avoid having to think" with "AI output, generated because you're thinking and want to find or understand something."
The two are miles apart.