you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 3 days ago (20 children)

I feel like this isn't about a cat

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago* (19 children)

    People were assuming that the biologist that discovered the new cat species was a white guy. She's a Bolivian biologist who is decidedly not a white guy.

    Just your average casual sexism weaving it's way through social media as usual.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 days ago (10 children)

    People were assuming that the biologist that discovered the new cat species was a white guy.

    where?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 days ago* (9 children)

    I’m answering what the OG post is talking about. I can dig up examples just as well as you can, but I’m not at my desk at the moment.

    The OP says “this site” and it looks like maybe Tumblr?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    So why is tumblr's issue our problem?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    If you didn’t assume she was a white guy, then this isn’t targeting you. You can put your pitchfork down.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Has anyone in this community, or on Lemmy or in the fediverse in general, been doing that? Else what's the relevance to us?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 days ago*

    That's the problem with screenshots of other social media platforms; we don't have any of the buildup or history leading up to this. I'm completely out of the loop on this entire thing. It's like seeing a 9 layer meme that builds on all the other memes posted this week without context

    Imagine seeing a post making fun of lämps and you're just like… what about lamps? They're bright?

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -8 points 3 days ago* (4 children)

    I can dig up examples just as well as you can, but I’m not at my desk at the moment.

    you should have done that before posting this screenshot out of context. If you're not willing to verify something is true, then don't repost it on social media.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    I didn't post the screenshot

    I'm not the OP

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    fine. The point stands though, OP should have provided context for this actually being an issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 3 days ago

    It's really common for people to assume scientists are white men.

    A newly published University of Virginia study has found that about two-thirds of students in a third- through fifth-grade extracurricular astronomy program perceive scientists as white men in labs, mixing chemicals – even as women and people of color increasingly work as scientists.

    The study authors found that these perceptions persist even after elementary school students have been tutored under young female scientists in a program designed to increase understanding of and exposure to astronomy.

    Here's another study on it:

    We found that the scientist image was rated predominantly as White and male, which reflects stereotypes about who pursues scientific careers. The scientist image was also rated more negatively than the other CIs on several characteristics, which may indicate negative biases toward scientists as unsociable, poor communicators, and incompetent authority figures, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    This isn't a made up phenomena just for social media. It really happens.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 3 days ago (6 children)

    Oh. Well, if that's the whole story, then this is a pretty weak science meme

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 days ago (5 children)

    Eh there’s value in calling out sexist assumptions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago (4 children)

    I guess so, it just would be nice to see two people verbally sparring, instead of a one-person narrative about a supposed firestorm

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    It’s an old trope that people assume any scientist is a white man.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago

    I saw the article before but didn't read the details, if I had seen the name ending with an -a I would have thought a woman. But that's also probably because I knew a guy named Paolo.

    There is absolutely sexism as well as racism still lurking around in the average person's assumptions. Seems a connected world hasn't (yet) fixed that. Might take more time.

  • source
  • parent