The lone holdout juror in the trial of Lindsay Clancy has said he "didn't have any doubts" that she was criminally responsible for killing her three children.

"Based on all the physical evidence, key witnesses and what the prosecution presents, I thought it was enough proof that she knew exactly what she was doing and planned it," Michael Desronvil said in a statement to CBS News, the BBC's US partner.

The judge declared a mistrial on 4 September after the jury failed to reach a unanimous verdict following nearly 40 hours of deliberating.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Telling women to be silent in case the right weaponizes what a minority of people are doing is in effect punishing all women for the actions of a few. You are working for conservatives by doing their work for them in advance. You are casting all women as irrational on the basis that the right will cast all women as irrational.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

    Telling women to be silent in case the right weaponizes what a minority of people are doing is in effect punishing all women for the actions of a few. You are working for conservatives by doing their work for them in advance. You are casting all women as irrational on the basis that the right will cast all women as irrational.

    And if we aren’t clear on what the right will do - if we ignore it wholesale - their tactics will be all the more effective.

    I’m NOT saying, “shut up”, I’m saying, “be aware of how what you are saying can and will be used against you and the rights you have fought so hard to achieve”.

    And from my discussions with other women (quite a few hundred over the last several months), female supporters of Lindsay Clancy are very much in the majority, even up here in Canada. It isn’t some fringe group, it is an above-50% proportion of adult women who think that she is either totally innocent, or at the very least not criminally liable for a well-planned, well-orchestrated, and clearly forethought series of murders. And that is disturbing AF, especially considering the wildly imbalanced gender sentencing gap.

    To be absolutely clear: a fair majority of women are openly rejecting true equality in sentencing for reasons that have absolutely nothing to do with equality and everything to do with establishing and maintaining special gender-unique privileges.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 day ago* (1 child)

    Believing that post partum psychosis can lead to terrible tragedies is not an extremist fringe belief. Believing that better treatment and healthcare for pregnant and post partum women in order to prevent these kinds of tragedies is not an extremist fringe belief. I will not stand by and let people like you frame those beliefs as extremist or fringe or not worthy of being taken seriously.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

    Believing that post partum psychosis can lead to terrible tragedies is not an extremist fringe belief. Believing that better treatment and healthcare for pregnant and post partum women in order to prevent these kinds of tragedies is not an extremist fringe belief. I will not stand by and let people like you frame those beliefs as extremist or fringe or not worthy of being taken seriously.

    Sweet Straw Man fallacy, bro. In my line of work, that’s called “dialling the intellectual bankruptcy up to 11”.

    I mean, if you wildly misinterpret my statements of “this is what the baddies will weaponize against you and women’s rights” as anything else other than exactly that, then there is nothing else I can do; you are fully insulated from any reasonable or rational debate. You are acting as a troll, manufacturing rage to more easily spout lies and claim falsehoods.

    Because I never said anything of the above quoted, either online or off.

  • source
  • parent