you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 19 points 1 week ago (21 children)

Lol someone reported this for "inciting war crimes" as if some random person on the Internet could convince Russia to bomb a civilian factory. Libs you are so weird

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 1 week ago (19 children)
  • [–] 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (18 children)

    Unfortunately azov Nazis appropriate and like to build drones in places like apartment blocks. You're right that the war is causing a lot of death and destruction, so let's bring back the USSR comrade.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [+] -4 points 1 week ago (17 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (16 children)
  • [+] -6 points 1 week ago (15 children)
  • [–] 9 points 6 days ago* (7 children)
  • [+] -3 points 6 days ago (6 children)
  • [–] 7 points 6 days ago (5 children)

    How about we compare that to Ukraine suffering about 10x the civilian casualties as Russia?

    Citation needed lol I bet you actually thought the "Ghost of Kiev" bullshit was real 😂

    I have Russia bombing civilian infrastructure

    Ah you mean Ukrainian air defenses being put in civilian areas (which is also a war crime but who cares about Ukrainian war crimes during a full scale invasion, they can do some war criming as a treat I guess)

    Also it's apparently fine for Ukraine to bomb civilians, markets, schools, literally just the other day they attacked a bus, this one particular bus for some reason, for the 11th time, I mean the list goes on lmao. Every accusation libs make against Russia is actually what Ukraine is doing, and you people are so easily manipulated that you're cheering on Nazis in a proxy war lol

    white phosphorous in civilian areas

    Citation needed again

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 6 days ago (4 children)

    I closed the tab for casualty stats and don't feel like digging that back up, but here's An article on white phosphorous in Bakhmut. I specifically remember watching videos of it falling from the sky when it hapoened., although this article may or may not be on a different incident, been too long to be 100% sure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 6 days ago (3 children)

    "Russia accused."

    "Attack targeted unoccupied areas of Bakhmut"

    "close to a children's hospital" (heartstrings, despite the article saying the area was unoccupied?)

    "could not verify the use of phosphorus" (so what is this article about??)

    "Use as an incendiary weapon near civilians would still be illegal... practically no civilians left in the area"

    So in summary... it would've been illegal and a war crime if civilians were there, which they weren't, and if it could be verified, which it wasn't.

    What a shite article. Western media is really the best at saying nothing at all. Though I'm sure it had the intended effect on people in Europe scared of Russia.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -3 points 6 days ago (2 children)
  • [–] 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

    Just trying to show you how the West does propaganda, that's all. It's basic media literacy. It may be small, but compound it and repeat it and you get powerful feelings of the war such as yours.

    They aren't my allies. I am no friend to Putin. He could die a hundred times over and I could not give a shit. What I do give a shit about is the constant imperialist machinations of the west who see outsiders as "orcs" or lesser human beings who don't deserve to live in peace because the people who lord it over you and me can't stand the idea that there are places in the world that don't obey them - however problematic those places may be (usually because of the very neoliberal imperialism I'm talking about...)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago (6 children)

    Your comparison falls short because Palestinians are justified to create weapons wherever and however they can, whereas Ukrainian Nazis should be destroyed wherever they are.

    The point is not simply that civilian infrastructure should not be destroyed, any infrastructure that a military can use is almost always useful to civilian population as well.

    The more material point is that the historical configurations of the Palestinian resistance against genocide in the last century do not render it comparable to the neo-nazi resurgence in Ukraine being spurred on by foreign and domestic anti Russian groups. Hopefully this helps, as you study historical materialism this will all become clearer to you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 1 week ago (5 children)
  • [–] 11 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    The focus is bullshit, but the groups do exist, but Russia exaggerates it. lmfao. how does that work?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -4 points 1 week ago (3 children)
  • [–] 13 points 1 week ago

    Here are Western news sources reporting on Ukraine's Neo-Nazi problem, since I'm sure you have an issue with Russia telling their side of the story.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20171110082733/https://thehill.com/opinion/international/359609-the-reality-of-neo-nazis-in-the-ukraine-is-far-from-kremlin-propaganda

    https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN1GV2TC

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2017/sep/04/i-want-to-bring-up-a-warrior-ukraines-far-right-childrens-camp-video

    Ironically these are all prior to 2022 when all these same outlets conveniently forgot this was a thing and started churning out Russia bad narratives (they were already doing this shit in 2016 with Russiagate bullshit)

  • source
  • parent