you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 21 points 1 week ago* (3 children)

Pretty sure the US has a military presence there since the 40s, if they let Trump have a headline for nothing that is a pretty good success

P.S don’t tell Trump this is the case

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    This is more about how it looks for denmark, even if the agreement itself is trivial.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    This basically looks quite silly for the USA

    Trump agrees not to have Greenland, something he has been saying for years that he'll get one way on another.

    In exchange here gets what he already had, and has been offered ever since he showed interest in Greenland. Access to military bases in Greenland. USA has that already and has been closing bases instead of opening more there

  • source
  • parent