Yeah, I will not pretend that I did not have fun with it. However, by the end of it I had not desire for more of it. As a result, I haven't played any of the sequels.

Spider-Man 2 already did this decades ago, and there was actually a learning curve to that game's traversal, making it way more satisfying when you got good at it.

It's not quite that simple. The first game also had THE best story and adaptation of the character we've ever seen.

I am going to throw my thoughts in. Spiderman is as good as Arkham City, and I think it depends on which super hero you prefer.

From a game standpoint, they are very close to each other, I think batman has slightly better stealth, but Spiderman has better traversal. Combat is good enough in both to give you enough room to be expressive if you want, and the open world fluff is mostly not insulting (maybe not those riddler trophies though).

Both are good 8/10 games.

But everything thing I have seen about Wolverine is at best fine, and then you just have the Devs insulting the players and their intelligence.

I am surprised wolverine is getting scores as high as it is, but from a glance and an outside point of view, I am offering a 4 or 5/10.

And one last note, Arkham Asylum is better than City, the more intricate level design is better than an open world.

Those games have way more depth and interesting worlds to explore.