One unexplored issue is a loophole that allows individuals to satisfy the work requirement if their household has at least $580 of monthly income—which includes gross gambling winnings (i.e., the profits from winning bets or gambling sessions) without netting out losses. In most states, individuals can maintain Medicaid coverage by showing $580 in gross gambling winnings once every six months.

Individuals averse to the risk of losing money may still be able to exploit the loophole, by taking positions on both sides of a single bet that guarantees both $580 in winnings and a somewhat larger loss, satisfying the work requirement without any financial risk apart from covering modest bookmaker fees.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 39 points 1 week ago* (8 children)

I really feel like this shit is the canary in the coal mine. The whole economy is just gambling now. There are no jobs.

It's time to get the fuck out of North America. Sell your shit, take your savings, and get the fuck out.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    there's nowhere in the west that isn't prone to this. the best place to flee, in terms of potential for living in a just society, is going to be the global south

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Does this ever work out in a non colonial way?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

    ask any refugee. i'd say china is the best equipped to soak the number of people fleeing but it's never going to be ideal

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Are there many refugees from the first world to the third world to ask? Usually they are expats or retirees which isn't quite the same experience.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    i'm not going to argue with that. it would be preferable in the interests of anti colonialism to seize assets over a certain amount to split asylum seekers from "expats"

    i won't deny the irony it's the the portrayal of southern refugees by western fascists only back to front and credible

  • source
  • parent