you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 12 hours ago (15 children)
  • [–] 9 points 12 hours ago* (14 children)

    There's a ton of non-bisexual people in this thread (and elsewhere) that present a false definition of bisexual that excludes trans/nb/agender/gf/generally gender non-conforming people. Or otherwise may assume that bisexual people are necessarily either monogamous or polyamorous, neither of which is universally true of all bi people. Actual bisexual people (like myself) are understandably upset by these incorrect assumptions. It's especially harmful to have people assume that a bisexual person wouldn't be attracted to a trans person because of the implied transphobia it puts on bisexual people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 10 hours ago (12 children)

    bi means two so it assumes two genders

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

    I don't experience my sexual orientation through the strict dictionary defintions of root words in the English language. I don't know why you think I would. I don't. I'm not anti Trans. I'm attracted to plenty of Trans people, fem men, masc women, and plenty of gender non confotming or queer people, being attracted to people who are 1. same as me and 2. not same as me is also a binary. but bi generally meaning experiencing both same sex attraction and opposite sex attraction doesn't mean I can't be attracted to a man that expresses generally female traits or sexual characteristics intentionally, I don't even know how it's hard to figure out that gender non conforming people would be as or more attractive to someone attracted to sexual characteristics of all permutations. Please. don't tell Bi people how they must experience their own sexuality based on the dictionary. It's very belittling and can only lead to misunderstandings and harm. if you want to be a real technical asshole about it, I'm attracted to the sexual characteristics of male and female bodies and I'm not concerned about those characteristics matching any 'right' or 'wrong' standard created by society or anyone other than the person who is expressing and existing in their desired state. You don't need to put anti Trans or anti gender queer sentiment on my sexual orientation, that makes no sense. I deeply love and respect and care for my Trans family members, friends, and fellow human beings.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 10 hours ago

    I'll apparently be quoting myself again in this thread.

    The bi part of bisexual refers to both homosexual (same gender) and heterosexual (different gender) so nobody's left out. I guess an argument could be made that an agender person might not fit under either umbrella, but i would still consider agender to be either same gender (if the bisexual person is also agender) or different gender (if the bisexual person is not agender).

    Surely you can understand that it's insensitive to tell a bisexual person what their own sexuality means. I recommend reading more and chiming in less on matters that you know little about, especially when replying to someone (me) who explicitly said that they don't appreciate the transphobic implications of an incorrect and ignorant interpretation of the term.

    Im bi and my partner is NB and bi. No part of that is confusing or contradictory.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 10 hours ago (7 children)

    Attracted to the same gender and other genders. Two.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago

    attracted to the sexual characteristics of men and women, why would that stop me from being attracted to someone that has any permutation of either sex characteristics in expression or configuration? and gender doesn't even enter into it of you want to be that technical, but again, gender being a construct, why would it bother me, a person attracted to many characteristics of gender expression be not attracted to someone who expresses a configuration of gender characteristics that mix and match or invent their own? that makes no sense. don't tell me how I experience my sexuality.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 10 hours ago (5 children)
  • [–] 0 points 10 hours ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 10 hours ago (1 child)

    I dont really think thats true.

    I think that bisexual is just a term that has stuck since its been in use for so many many years

    Its like feminism. Indeed the term feminism has the term 'fem' iin it so many people may assume that it has to do with equal rights of females ONLY . And indeed when liberal feminism started to be talked of more during the 1910s and 1940s when women and non-males starting taking up the jobs of dead males from the world wars it was indeed about more rights and suffrage for ONLY women... but I think that most modern feminists that are worrh their mettle would agree with me that femism has evolved to mean many things about ALL genders and has a lot to do with equality, independence, and equity amongst ALL genders.

    Im a proletarian feminist and proletarian feminism has absolutely nothing to do with radical feminism or liberal feminism. So even though these terms are similar they are nothing a like in practice.

    And feminism has nothing to do with those people in the past who ONLY resisted the current system for ONLY more women's rights - feminism has nothing to do with those who push for 'female supremacy' despite the term's 'fem' in it.

    Being bisexual means many things nowadays to all people of ALL genders (I dont know and dont care how many genders there are. People should be able tk be who they want to be.) and there are many categories of bisexual peoples . But bisexual people have simply stuck with this term of 'bisexual' becauee the term simply stuck during the 1970s.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment