Bluesky comments

This is bipartisan and utterly stupid, a backdoor hit on electric vehicles. Electric vehicle motors generate electromagnetic interference that causes static on AM radio frequencies.

---

This sure sounds like a subsidy to talk radio broadcasters and legacy tech manufacturers tarted up with an extremely dubious public safety pretext.

Full textIt turns out that the one thing that can apparently bridge Washington’s partisan divide is AM radio. U.S. automakers may be forced to build AM radio into new vehicles within the next year.

The House of Representatives, in a rare instance of bipartisan support, overwhelmingly approved legislation on Wednesday that would require new cars, trucks, and SUVs to be built with AM radio at no additional charge to consumers. The AM Radio for Every Vehicle Act, which would direct the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to require automakers to include AM radio in new passenger vehicles as standard equipment, will now head to the Senate.

Until recently, proponents of AM radio have waged an unsuccessful lobbying effort for a mandate, arguing that it offers critical information during emergencies because its signal can travel long distances. But a groundswell of support from Democrats and Republicans, the broadcast industry, emergency responder organizations, and even former administrators of the Federal Emergency Management Agency is pushing this legislation closer to becoming law.

And there is reason to believe the Senate will follow the House’s lead on the bill, which was co-sponsored by Senators Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Ted Cruz (R-Texas). Earlier this year, the senators secured 60 co-sponsors for their version of the bill, a critical threshold to overcoming a filibuster.

Cruz, who chairs the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, and Markey hailed the decision in a joint statement Wednesday.

“This vote sends a clear message to car manufacturers that AM Radio is a lifeline that must be protected in new vehicles. From emergency response to sports, entertainment, and news, AM radio is an essential communication tool for tens of millions of Americans. It is now time for the Senate to pass the AM Radio for Every Vehicle Act and for this legislation to become law so AM radio remains a trusted and essential resource for commuters and communities across the country.”

A growing number of automakers, including BMW, Rivian, Tesla, and Volvo, have moved away from the century-old broadcast band in favor of software-defined vehicles that offer streaming services like TuneIn and SiriusXM. Ford had also removed AM radio from some vehicles but has since reversed course.

Tesla couldn’t be reached for comment; Rivian declined to comment for this story.

EV makers have led the charge because the electromagnetic interference generated by electric motors can affect the frequencies used by AM radio. Automakers have argued that this interference degrades the AM signal and audio quality.

Tesla doesn’t have AM receivers in the base versions of its Model 3 and Model Y vehicles. Rivian’s new R2 SUV doesn’t have an FM or AM receiver; however, the vehicle model offers AM/FM radio through the digital radio platform iHeartRadio for free. The Rivian R1S and R1T models allow customers to access FM content digitally or via built‐in receiver.

https://techcrunch.com/2026/09/16/us-automakers-could-soon-be-forced-to-include-am-radio-for-free/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 28 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Lol that second bluesky is so ass.

A growing number of automakers, including BMW, Rivian, Tesla, and Volvo, have moved away from the century-old broadcast band in favor of software-defined vehicles that offer streaming services like TuneIn and SiriusXM.

Yeah, big AM radio has more pull than SiriusXM. All those emergency weather alerts are raking in the cash.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 days ago (8 children)

    Literally the only group that will benefit from this move is sports and conservative AM talk radio. It's total crank shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    AM radio can get a signal out 250 miles using only a diesel generator at the tower and I can receive it with a hand held battery powered receiver with a hand crank backup. Some of us live in rural areas with spotty 5g coverage under ideal circumstances. And areas like this are the least likely to get immediate assistance in the event of an emergency.

    Hell, the local FM/Am station in my rural town (they broadcast on both) is the only way to get decent communication about what's going on in the area since most of the farm houses don't even have broadband Internet connections. Just because you don't see the value doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago

    I'm one of three volunteers in my region trying to keep the VHF EAS systems (weather band radio) live despite the government actively trying to sabotage it.

    Believe me, I understand the value of emergency radio services. My point here is that the government does not sincerely care about emergency radio broadcasting, not that radio is bad and stupid.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 days ago*

    And emergency broadcasting. If cell towers go down, what other means of communication are there? AM and FM are long-range and simple technologies. It would even be easy to set up low-power portable radio stations if necessary.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

    I agree mostly. I guess what I’m trying to say is that bluesky comment seems to believe this bill is entirely propped by conservative talk radio, as if conservative talk radio is not part of a much broader reactionary web of special interests. That notion skirts how disproportionately small the impact of AM radio is to the broader conservative movement, which has modernized considerably with podcasts and the like. I can understand legacy tech manufacturers lobbying to have AM receivers installed in car. That makes sense. But you’d think that a conservative talk radio lobby would also be lobbying Congress to require new cars to have WiFi or 5G receivers.

    To me, it seems if lobbyists proposed this legislation then they probably made some salient points about public safety, to the chagrin of auto manufacturers. Yes, sports and conservative AM talk radio would be the main benefactors of this bill. But it reads less like a clever conspiracy to inject conservativism into everyone’s cars and more like regular ass law that keeps an associated dying industry alive for a while longer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    It's just a useless bill that achieves nothing, and their stated justification is an outright fabrication.

    I don't think there's some conspiracy here, it's just dumb cranks in office doing crank stuff.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • They're cranks, and they're old and out of touch. I'm sure they think am radio is super important to their whole project. It's also virtue signaling to their base with minimal risk even if 99% of them haven't ever tuned into an am radio station in the past 20 years.

  • source
  • parent