you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 0 points 3 hours ago* (4 children)

No? Where have I excluded that option? If for normal volumes 100 employees are need to process. And with AI only 50 are needed, then it's still cost saving?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 2 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

    If we're making up numbers my point is that with 100 employees using AI you get 2x the quality than 50 employees using AI

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 0 points 3 hours ago* (2 children)

    I'm making up numbers because I don't have the actual numbers and 2x is easy for the example, insert whatever numbers you like.

    The issue with that statement is that putting double the employees on a project doesn't always improve its quality.

    If we go with the numbers we have been going with and a employee with AI is twice as productive then adding AI effectively doubles the time available. This only leads to a quality increase if work was being cut short. If each employee already got the required time necessary to handle a application with full quality then you haven't increased quality but the capacity. If the now increased capacity is far above normal volume it is a waste to have so much excess capacity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 2 points 2 hours ago (1 child)

    Hardly, you need to maintain the same numbers to double check the work of AI. Haven't improved throughput, but this guarantees better quality

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment