I oppose the illegal and unjustifiable war in Iran and demand an immediate end to the hostilities. While I oppose a nuclear-armed Iran, I understand that diplomatic means of achieving that goal are more effective and come with a far lower human cost, just as President Obama had achieved under the JCPOA.

That's quite a bit different than "doesn't support Iran."

The only mention of Ukraine on his campaign website is:

When we act in the interest of human rights and democracy–as in supporting Ukraine against Russian invasion

That's a very standard bad lib take. But that's just the difference between a party worth critical support and one worth a fuller measure of support -- the former has some bad positions! Look at Russia's relationship with Israel.

Iran is a theocracy and Russia is capitalist. They aren't good, they are currently resisting imperialism. Hence why support for them is critical support.

when in fact our goal is the fastest possible destruction of the USA

accelerationism time

our goal is the fastest possible destruction of the USA

OK, what's your plan for this? Until there's a credible answer to that, there is no reason to attack one of the handful of U.S. politicians who is willing to call a genocide a genocide.