you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 31 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Marry Shelley's husband was not John Polidori, it was Percy Bysshe Shelley. Surprised no one picked this up. Percy was an amazing poet.

John Polidori was in love with Mary, but was not married to her

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 17 hours ago

    I think that was just poor grammar, seems like "her husband" and John Polidori are two separate characters in the statement not that John Polidori was an elaboration of what her husband's name was. But that's how I read it initially too.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    The OP does not suggest that John Polidori was her husband. There's a comma between "her husband" and "John Polidori". And in fact the post seems to be correct (judging by Wiki):

    In 1816—at the suggestion of Lord Byron—Mary, Percy, John Polidori and Byron himself, each agreed to try writing a ghost story

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 22 hours ago (1 child)

    Well, it's an unclear structure. Putting a comma before and after someone's name is correct if including the name would not change the meaning of the sentence, as in this case. In the case of OP's sentence, it could have implied that Polidori was Mary Shelley's husband as his name, while important to the meaning of the sentence, was included in a list of other people, including Mary Shelley, Mary Shelley's husband, and Lord Byron.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 22 hours ago*

    I agree it is ambiguous, however usually you don't separate parentheticals by commas inside a comma-separated list, so the "more likely" reading is the one without the parenthetical.

    An unambiguous version that doesn't diminish the joke would be "Lord Byron, John Polidori, Mary Shelley, and her husband". But alas it's difficult for writers to find ambiguities in texts that they write (that's what editors are for).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 20 hours ago*

    I see the comma now, but Percy Bysshe Shelley was an incredible writer who is studied and lauded, rightly, on his own merit. Anyone reading this thinking Mary's husband is insignificant compared to Frankenstein needs to read Ozymandias or The Masque of Anarchy right now and witness this beautiful, humanistic and liberatory spirit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    As Balsoft said, that is part of the punchline of the joke: People only know him now as Mary Shelly's husband.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 20 hours ago

    I mean, I'm a big fan of Percy Shelley's poetry, the fact that he isn't taught more IMO has to do with the liberatory character of his writing more than he was an inferior writer to Mary. Mary's book is great, but PBS was an incredible writer whose work has wide cultural significance, even if we aren't like forced to read it in school or whatever.

    People should read more PBS, he should be more popular.

  • source
  • parent