you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 23 hours ago (1 child)

Well, it's an unclear structure. Putting a comma before and after someone's name is correct if including the name would not change the meaning of the sentence, as in this case. In the case of OP's sentence, it could have implied that Polidori was Mary Shelley's husband as his name, while important to the meaning of the sentence, was included in a list of other people, including Mary Shelley, Mary Shelley's husband, and Lord Byron.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 22 hours ago*

    I agree it is ambiguous, however usually you don't separate parentheticals by commas inside a comma-separated list, so the "more likely" reading is the one without the parenthetical.

    An unambiguous version that doesn't diminish the joke would be "Lord Byron, John Polidori, Mary Shelley, and her husband". But alas it's difficult for writers to find ambiguities in texts that they write (that's what editors are for).

  • source
  • parent