A juror in the trial of Lindsay Clancy is sharing new details about what he said happened inside the jury room that led to a mistrial in the case of the Massachusetts woman facing first-degree murder charges for the 2023 deaths of her three young children.

Nick Dargie, one of the three men on the 12-person jury, told ABC News' Aaron Katersky that the lone holdout juror who prevented a unanimous verdict did not show any evidence explaining his vote.

"There was several times I would ask him to show us evidence or, you know, describe a witness testimony that helped to prove what he was saying, and ... he couldn't," Dargie, 25, said in an interview Wednesday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I’m not debating how the law is (or the details of this case), my claim is about how it should be, which is written in enormous letters and you still somehow missed it.

“Demonic possession” indicates the approximate level of ignorance required to think that “criminal insanity” should be a legal option for a defendant in a case about killing children.

  • source
  • parent