A juror in the trial of Lindsay Clancy is sharing new details about what he said happened inside the jury room that led to a mistrial in the case of the Massachusetts woman facing first-degree murder charges for the 2023 deaths of her three young children.

Nick Dargie, one of the three men on the 12-person jury, told ABC News' Aaron Katersky that the lone holdout juror who prevented a unanimous verdict did not show any evidence explaining his vote.

"There was several times I would ask him to show us evidence or, you know, describe a witness testimony that helped to prove what he was saying, and ... he couldn't," Dargie, 25, said in an interview Wednesday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child)
  • Do rabid animals understand the wrongness of biting children? So what?
  • Are human beings animals?

Congratulations! You’ve graduated to having a consistent normative view.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago

    Okay you have to understad that we are trying to have a civilisation here.

    Your point of view is not consistent.

    If you want a murderer punished like you would a "rabid animal" because we are just animals and don't need further understanding than there is no reason to object murder in general.

  • source
  • parent