Kobibi comments on The world map is changing: The UN has backed replacing the 500-year-old Mercator projection with the accurate Equal Earth projection

The world map is changing: The UN has backed replacing the 500-year-old Mercator projection with the accurate Equal Earth projection (thelemmy.club)

submitted 1 day ago by time2lose@lemmy.world to c/interestingasfuck@lemmy.world

152 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Kobibi@sh.itjust.works 42 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (6 children)

As a neurodivergent map person, I'm over-aware of the difficulties of map projection. And I agree that simply calling this new projection 'accurate' is misleading

But at the same time, the use of the Mercator as the standard default map in situations that have nothing to do with ocean navigation for literally hundreds of years is absolutely a reflection of the relative power of the Global North, and can't be dismissed as 'nonsense about colonialism'

parent

hideshow 12 child comments

[–] UnequalExchange@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

so coming from you pleasr tell us what would be the best way to project an as accurate as possible world map? I mena both in 3D version and as a 2D version

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] paraplu@piefed.social 6 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Pick one that suits your application.

If you're not using it to engage in navigation, Equal Earth is a sensible default.

Tools like Google maps are a bit thornier. They're used for navigation, but generally not in a way where angles matter. I could see someone getting themselves into trouble because the angles are screwy. But then again if Google cared about that sort of case, we wouldn't have the recent story of the Gemini hikers.

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 59 minutes ago

That is not really an answer.

What is the best general world map to teach kids about the world, that we can put in a book or as a poster on the wall, without having to switch to different maps for each lessen, confusing everyone?

If it is not Mercator, then which one is?

parent

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 point 15 hours ago*

yeah, i tried to figure out the angle between two points off google maps the other day. it fucking sucked. i ended up using another website that was basically a frontend for doing it.

i'm still not sure if it was right. if i go orienteering again, i'm bringing paper maps. precharted routes and angles drawn in so i don't have to look anything up out in the field. orienteering off your phone is stupid.

parent

[–] philipp_@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 17 hours ago (1 child)

A 3D version would be a globe. A 2D version is inherently inaccurate because it's 2D and the earth is not. You are free to pick your poison in the manner of your projection but you will always loose something.

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] UnequalExchange@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

So when it comes to picking a 2D poison which ome would be currently best? The new UN map ? or ....

Or would a better solution for 2D be a 'collection' of pictures of the Earth from numerous different angles? And we just look at each of the angles seperately as their own seperate 2D picture of different parts of the Earth? So Im talking we supposedly take 14 or 20 or more different pictures of the Earth from 14 or 20 or more different angles of the Earth then we just lay out each of those pictures and it is up to the viewer to look at each picture of each angles of the Earth and to do what they can in their head with those pictures. Bad idea, good idea?

parent

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 4 points 17 hours ago (1 child)

The Mercator projection really seems to be Africa-centric if anything

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Kobibi@sh.itjust.works 6 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

In what way? It inflates the size of areas as they get further away from the equator, resulting in Africa being portrayed as relatively much smaller than it is compared to Europe and North America

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 7 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Africa is by far the most accurately portrayed part of the map, and it’s right in the center.

parent

hideshow 6 child comments

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 1 point 28 minutes ago

The big advantage is that the 180th meridian ends up in a very unpopulated part of the world. It is Chukotka Oblast and more importantly Fiji. For the current 0meridian style maps, that is two edges being without much population and not cutting too many continents.

parent

[–] Kobibi@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago

The center - east to west - is 0 degrees longitude, defined as the Royal Observatory in Greenwich, England. This does also go through West Africa

The center - north to south - is 0 degrees latitude, defined as the equator.

Because of this, Africa is central on the vast majority of world map projections including the Mercator and the Equal Earth.

Accuracy is relative. The Mercator distorts areas bigger the further away they are from the equator. This exaggerates the size of the USA, Europe etc compared to Africa.

parent

[–] Jtotheb@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago

Now I’m imagining a dick measuring contest where the men care more about whose is measured most accurately for some reason, rather than showing off how long their dick is

parent

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

it's in the center?

parent

[–] w3ird_sloth@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

Exactly. It's easy to brush off the idea of soft power but it has real consequences.

parent

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 1 point 16 hours ago (1 child)

You know it’s the Reverse Mercator right?

It’s been the best way to transform a curved surface to a plane surface in a way that people understand.

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Kobibi@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago (1 child)

It's not the Reverse Mercator... I'm not sure what that is

Do you mean Transverse Mercator? Although it's not that either

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 1 point 5 hours ago* (1 child)

Yeah I did, thank you

Edit: and yeah we definitely use the transverse

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Kobibi@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago* (1 child)

(Well, we do sometimes but it's not the map in question)

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 1 point 37 minutes ago (1 child)

The link you provide says we use the Transverse Mercator projection

I screwed up with ‘reverse’ but it was transverse I meant and it’s what’s popularly used.

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Kobibi@sh.itjust.works 1 point 8 minutes ago*

It says it is used. But it's not the map this thread is talking about. It's not the map the UN is replacing. It's not the map in the thumbnail. It's not the original Mercator map. Its not the most widely used map projection.

It's used in specific situations yes

parent

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 1 point 16 hours ago

It is complete nonsense. Use makes something standard, and maps have most been used in navigation. So it naturally becomes the default.

This is how ALL defaults become defaults, even when they're wrong.

parent

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 1 point 19 hours ago (2 children)

What better alternative projection they could use at the time for navigation?

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] Kobibi@sh.itjust.works 3 points 17 hours ago (1 child)

I don't know? That's not what we're talking about. We're talking about the UN using it not for navigation in 2026

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 1 point 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

But at the same time, the use of the Mercator as the standard default map in situations that have nothing to do with ocean navigation for literally hundreds of years

My question continues that thread.
And my point (subtle it may be) is that when something is wildly useful, it sticks.
Despite not being universally good.

And to change from it you need more than just a slight advantage.
That's why the UN didn't think about changing map projection.

parent

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 19 hours ago (1 child)

You might note that the present is, in fact, not 500 years ago.

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 1 point 19 hours ago (1 child)

Is that the answer to my question?

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 19 hours ago (1 child)

If you’re asking me to tell you the best way to navigate 500 years ago, I can’t help you because I’m not a historian. The point is that really has absolutely no bearing on how we should use maps today in the present.

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 1 point 18 hours ago (1 child)

And the present doesn't affect the past.

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

from the perspective of an art conservationist i'm not entirely sure i agree.

parent