▲ -17 ▼ What's your thoughts on the Lyndsey Clancy case? (reddthat.com) submitted 17 hours ago by LadyButterfly@reddthat.com to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world 28 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] disregardable@lemmy.zip 15 points 17 hours ago (2 children) No, it's not illegal for a juror to come to a different conclusion than the rest of the panel. people are so annoying. permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] LadyButterfly@reddthat.com [S] 1 point 9 hours ago (1 child) From what I've read they refused to apply the law as directed by the judge. I totally support them having a different verdict but this is different permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] disregardable@lemmy.zip 1 point 9 hours ago That is the interpretation of the people who disagree with his conclusion. permalink fedilink source parent [–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 1 point 16 hours ago (1 child) Juries should not make medical decisions anyway. Apparently that conclusion contradicted "reasonable doubt", by the way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 0 points 15 hours ago (1 child) Juries shouldn't make decisions period. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 1 point 14 hours ago Honestly nobody should make decisions. Just leave it up to the dice rolls. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LadyButterfly@reddthat.com [S] 1 point 9 hours ago (1 child) From what I've read they refused to apply the law as directed by the judge. I totally support them having a different verdict but this is different permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] disregardable@lemmy.zip 1 point 9 hours ago That is the interpretation of the people who disagree with his conclusion. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] disregardable@lemmy.zip 1 point 9 hours ago That is the interpretation of the people who disagree with his conclusion. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 1 point 16 hours ago (1 child) Juries should not make medical decisions anyway. Apparently that conclusion contradicted "reasonable doubt", by the way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 0 points 15 hours ago (1 child) Juries shouldn't make decisions period. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 1 point 14 hours ago Honestly nobody should make decisions. Just leave it up to the dice rolls. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 0 points 15 hours ago (1 child) Juries shouldn't make decisions period. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 1 point 14 hours ago Honestly nobody should make decisions. Just leave it up to the dice rolls. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 1 point 14 hours ago Honestly nobody should make decisions. Just leave it up to the dice rolls. permalink fedilink source parent