Maybe not invade a neighboring country yourself, and then keep investing material and manpower after the invasion has stalled for no discernible gain.

You said what they supposedly shouldn't do (which would mean that Iran shouldn't have struck NATO puppets in its vicinity that house NATO bases and equipment, by the way). You did not say what they should do.

Also the implication that Russia is supposedly not winning when it has been advancing is rather silly.

What the UN conclude was that while there are reeducation camps and systemic discrimination, there is not sufficient evidence to say its a genocide. Which is like “We can prove that A killed B, but we can’t prove that it’s murder”.

Haha. What you are saying is actually "I can't prove that A killed B, but A definitely murdered B!".
Do you even know what a genocide is?

Funnily enough, it’s only ever the deniers who bring up this guy.

So far, the only source the proponents bring.

That’s a quite deliberate misconstruction of the facts. Amnesty International initially promoted the story

"You are wrong to say that Amnesty promoted the atrocity propaganda. Amnesty did promote the atrocity propaganda..."

Also,

There’s no evidence of malpractice on their part.

Amnesty International promoted the story