▲ 16 ▼ Inside the $5M doomsday bunker where the ultra-rich could ride out disaster (local12.com) submitted 1 month ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/usa@lemmy.ml 10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] LemsGhost@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (4 children) enough diesel fuel to run its generators for 2 1/2 years. So you'll survive doomsday as long as it only lasts 2 1/2 years. permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] nodiratime@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago* (3 children) Someone should tell them about hysteresis. Also, 5M is absolute laughable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] LemsGhost@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (2 children) I mean how much money would you have to spend on a bunker for it to work out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nodiratime@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child) If they cared about riding out the fallout, they would have to spend enough to make it possible to stay in there for at least a few generations, at least. And that would probably cost way north of 50M, but I didn't bother to sanity check that number. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] LemsGhost@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 month ago Yeah but do any of them want to...seriously? It could last much longer than nuclear fall out. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nodiratime@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago* (3 children) Someone should tell them about hysteresis. Also, 5M is absolute laughable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] LemsGhost@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (2 children) I mean how much money would you have to spend on a bunker for it to work out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nodiratime@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child) If they cared about riding out the fallout, they would have to spend enough to make it possible to stay in there for at least a few generations, at least. And that would probably cost way north of 50M, but I didn't bother to sanity check that number. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] LemsGhost@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 month ago Yeah but do any of them want to...seriously? It could last much longer than nuclear fall out. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LemsGhost@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (2 children) I mean how much money would you have to spend on a bunker for it to work out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nodiratime@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child) If they cared about riding out the fallout, they would have to spend enough to make it possible to stay in there for at least a few generations, at least. And that would probably cost way north of 50M, but I didn't bother to sanity check that number. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] LemsGhost@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 month ago Yeah but do any of them want to...seriously? It could last much longer than nuclear fall out. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nodiratime@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child) If they cared about riding out the fallout, they would have to spend enough to make it possible to stay in there for at least a few generations, at least. And that would probably cost way north of 50M, but I didn't bother to sanity check that number. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] LemsGhost@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 month ago Yeah but do any of them want to...seriously? It could last much longer than nuclear fall out. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LemsGhost@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 month ago Yeah but do any of them want to...seriously? It could last much longer than nuclear fall out. permalink fedilink source parent