you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 2 days ago (1 child)

I'm sorry, what? It's correctly identified that it's what, now?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    It's original in the book. What the user entered is an exact copy.

    "Original" is not the correct work but you know what I mean.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    The little scale thing doesn't say it is 100% not original, it says it is AI/LLM generated.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    Yes...because the pasted text has some of the exact patterns that are part of the dataset that the website trained on...because that dataset contains text generated from a dataset containing the exact paragraph...

    I feel like you're being deliberately obtuse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 days ago* (1 child)

    I feel like you don't understand the difference between 'AI generated' and 'something that existed over 200 years ago'.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    I feel like you don't understand that LLMs train on text that existed 200 years ago...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago (1 child)

    So you confirm that you don't understand the difference. Ok.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Sorry for not answering your idiotic question. Also sorry that you're dead set on deliberately misunderstanding then doubling down on it. Hope it makes you feels smart!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments