▲ 1271 ▼ The real monster turned out to be AI plagiarism (thelemmy.club) submitted 2 days ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world 134 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 2 days ago* (1 child) But until we get laws in place banning AI (and reducing their board of directors to mulch), we should try to support detecting and punishing its use. What exactly do you think drives the AI detectors? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 child) Answer the question. Edit: All right, since you won't, I'll spell it out for you. It's AI. The AI detectors are AI models. You are suggesting we put the policing of AI use in the hands of AI. It's not even close to a good idea. It's nothing less than self-defeating. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 2 days ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 2 days ago* (1 child) But until we get laws in place banning AI (and reducing their board of directors to mulch), we should try to support detecting and punishing its use. What exactly do you think drives the AI detectors? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 child) Answer the question. Edit: All right, since you won't, I'll spell it out for you. It's AI. The AI detectors are AI models. You are suggesting we put the policing of AI use in the hands of AI. It's not even close to a good idea. It's nothing less than self-defeating. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 2 days ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 child) Answer the question. Edit: All right, since you won't, I'll spell it out for you. It's AI. The AI detectors are AI models. You are suggesting we put the policing of AI use in the hands of AI. It's not even close to a good idea. It's nothing less than self-defeating. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 2 days ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 child) Answer the question. Edit: All right, since you won't, I'll spell it out for you. It's AI. The AI detectors are AI models. You are suggesting we put the policing of AI use in the hands of AI. It's not even close to a good idea. It's nothing less than self-defeating. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 2 days ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent