▲ 142 ▼ Judgement Day (thelemmy.club) submitted 4 hours ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world 9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 hours ago (1 child) I mean… logistically it would be more efficient if we all just recycled regardless, and then the polluters paid for the processing. But also we should lean on those “reduce” and “reuse” parts of the recycling prayer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago* (1 child) I mean… logistically it would be more efficient if we all just recycled regardless, and then the polluters paid for the processing. Logistically it would be more efficient if we went back to having bottle deposits (and expanded it to include other types of containers) so that the packaging would be picked up and reused, not recycled. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 hours ago But that’s functionally the same as what I’m saying: end consumer still has to put things in the right bins and place. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago* (1 child) I mean… logistically it would be more efficient if we all just recycled regardless, and then the polluters paid for the processing. Logistically it would be more efficient if we went back to having bottle deposits (and expanded it to include other types of containers) so that the packaging would be picked up and reused, not recycled. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 hours ago But that’s functionally the same as what I’m saying: end consumer still has to put things in the right bins and place. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 hours ago But that’s functionally the same as what I’m saying: end consumer still has to put things in the right bins and place. permalink fedilink source parent