you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 115 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Let's also ban it for teachers who create educational materials. My kids receive and work with such materials and it's wrong so often and deeply, the teachers can't even explain how to solve problems.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 4 days ago* (1 child)

    As a teacher, I can't agree enough. I'm really tired of being handed slop from my coworkers, and then having to weigh the social implications of explaining to them how I know it is slop and why this particular case of slop is bad. The amount of energy I have to spend deconstructing their use of AI, and then translating and validating that deconstruction to them, doesn't match the effortlessness with which they pump out more slop and leave me frustrated that I have to do this every time.

    Just ban it from use in elementary and secondary schools, please.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago

    Yep. And then, in high school, give them plenty of chances to check-out and critique the LLMs. Good factual criticism skills are very valuable in most of life (they include not ruining the effect by being a snotty fart).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 4 days ago

    South Park satirized the whole AI thing pretty well. I recommend those episodes. I remember all the stories about teachers using AI to grade papers. It reminds me of a teacher I had who claimed to grade papers by throwing them down the stairs and grading based on how far they went!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    I'm an adult taking night classes at my local community college. I have two instructors (neither is technically a professor). One is my age, and she begs us not to use AI, as some of my classmates openly talk about using it. My other instructor is in her 60s and all of her assignments have little notes under the header that say "this worksheet was generated by copilot". It's baffling. My feedback at the end of the semester is always "this class was great, but I wish the assignments didn't use AI".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    Yeah, I'm paying tuition for a human teacher. I'm not paying anything for an AI-generated tutor. If the producer doesn't value the work, I don't see why I should.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • I didn't mean to misrepresent the situation. She inputs all the material herself but uses copilot to format the worksheet, including the addition of emojis and clip art, and AI generated images all over the online class forum. She's very involved with the students' work and is a fountain of knowledge during classes, which makes her completely unnecessary use of AI so terribly confusing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    Go on ratemyprofessor and give her a low score. That actually does influence professors imo.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    Teacher here, it doesn't. There is a strong bias on this kind of site towards negative reviews so we tend to ignore it as a. it doesn't represent reality and b. we want to keep our mental health.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 days ago

    It's been like half a decade (fuck, old) since I was in college but I never felt it had a particularly negative slant. Most good professors had very good ratings, the one actually-bad professor I took had a pretty bad rating (but she was the only one available for that class).

    I always used it when signing up for classes, so even if it doesn't influence individual educators, it'll tell you who to avoid. Especially for valid critiques like "fills her lessons with AI slop".

  • source
  • parent