you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

But there’s also a gigantic investment in carbon capture attached to it.

Maybe that bullshit flies at Queens polisci.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    you're right comrade. Let's get comrade polivierre into power, he will surely help the planet and the first nations people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Carbon capture isn't economical yet which is why it had to be forced as part of the deal. However, silly Billy, it does capture carbon, our ostensible climate goal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    Again. Bullshit. Pure political theatre, no different than Clean Coal. Liberal Arts major love the idea of carbon capture.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Again, you seem to be misunderstanding the difference between technically viable and commercially viable.

    You are welcome to share a reputable source that says carbon capture does not prevent carbon from entering the system...

  • source
  • parent