▲ 73 ▼ 1Password Supports the Ethnic Cleansing of Europe (www.alilleybrinker.com) submitted 16 hours ago by InevitableSwing@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net 26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] tombruzzo@hexbear.net 6 points 15 hours ago (2 children) OK, I'm going to have to switch to self hosted bitwarden now permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] supafuzz@hexbear.net 10 points 15 hours ago (1 child) I have a keepass file that I keep synced between all my devices with syncthing. No corporations to do hateful shit, no servers to breach permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] swelter_spark@reddthat.com 4 points 12 hours ago Never had any problems with keepass. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 6 points 14 hours ago (1 child) Use vaultwarden. Its basically bitwarden but with a rust backend and all features automatically unlocked. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] tombruzzo@hexbear.net 4 points 13 hours ago (1 child) Well if it uses Rust then I gotta use it. Thank you permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 2 points 9 hours ago* (2 children) But for everyone else, the rust backend has a way smaller footprint than microsoft java C# and to selhost bitwarden without the paywall is an AGPL violation. Not that anyone will prosecute you for that but have some sort of honor code. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 2 points 1 hour ago to selhost bitwarden without the paywall is an AGPL violation. The AGPL has no clause like that. permalink fedilink source parent [–] combat_brandonism@hexbear.net 2 points 7 hours ago to selhost bitwarden without the paywall is an AGPL violation. wot if you publish your selfhosted fork that has the paywall removed? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] supafuzz@hexbear.net 10 points 15 hours ago (1 child) I have a keepass file that I keep synced between all my devices with syncthing. No corporations to do hateful shit, no servers to breach permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] swelter_spark@reddthat.com 4 points 12 hours ago Never had any problems with keepass. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] swelter_spark@reddthat.com 4 points 12 hours ago Never had any problems with keepass. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 6 points 14 hours ago (1 child) Use vaultwarden. Its basically bitwarden but with a rust backend and all features automatically unlocked. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] tombruzzo@hexbear.net 4 points 13 hours ago (1 child) Well if it uses Rust then I gotta use it. Thank you permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 2 points 9 hours ago* (2 children) But for everyone else, the rust backend has a way smaller footprint than microsoft java C# and to selhost bitwarden without the paywall is an AGPL violation. Not that anyone will prosecute you for that but have some sort of honor code. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 2 points 1 hour ago to selhost bitwarden without the paywall is an AGPL violation. The AGPL has no clause like that. permalink fedilink source parent [–] combat_brandonism@hexbear.net 2 points 7 hours ago to selhost bitwarden without the paywall is an AGPL violation. wot if you publish your selfhosted fork that has the paywall removed? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tombruzzo@hexbear.net 4 points 13 hours ago (1 child) Well if it uses Rust then I gotta use it. Thank you permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 2 points 9 hours ago* (2 children) But for everyone else, the rust backend has a way smaller footprint than microsoft java C# and to selhost bitwarden without the paywall is an AGPL violation. Not that anyone will prosecute you for that but have some sort of honor code. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 2 points 1 hour ago to selhost bitwarden without the paywall is an AGPL violation. The AGPL has no clause like that. permalink fedilink source parent [–] combat_brandonism@hexbear.net 2 points 7 hours ago to selhost bitwarden without the paywall is an AGPL violation. wot if you publish your selfhosted fork that has the paywall removed? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 2 points 9 hours ago* (2 children) But for everyone else, the rust backend has a way smaller footprint than microsoft java C# and to selhost bitwarden without the paywall is an AGPL violation. Not that anyone will prosecute you for that but have some sort of honor code. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 2 points 1 hour ago to selhost bitwarden without the paywall is an AGPL violation. The AGPL has no clause like that. permalink fedilink source parent [–] combat_brandonism@hexbear.net 2 points 7 hours ago to selhost bitwarden without the paywall is an AGPL violation. wot if you publish your selfhosted fork that has the paywall removed? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 2 points 1 hour ago to selhost bitwarden without the paywall is an AGPL violation. The AGPL has no clause like that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] combat_brandonism@hexbear.net 2 points 7 hours ago to selhost bitwarden without the paywall is an AGPL violation. wot if you publish your selfhosted fork that has the paywall removed? permalink fedilink source parent