you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 34 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Man I wish that number actually meant anything

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Some games I have no clue how they managed their Deck verification. Monster Hunter Wilds recently got it, and there is just no way that game can run smoothly on that thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    30 FPS. No frame gen.

    Runs pretty well. Lots of texture pop-in and the only place I have slowdowns is when the seasons are "plenty" and there is extra vegetation in the plains and jungle.

    Not perfect but playable. I probably could get more out of it by lowering textures and additional character animations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 1 week ago* (2 children)

    There needs to be a rating system.

    • Runs (but borderline unplayable)
    • Plays well (but not perfect)
    • Plays great!

    Tried to run Expedition 33 on it and although performance seemed ok, it looked a right mess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago

    I mean, there is. Just with two levels instead of three. Playable and verified are the two highest and on top of that we have Unsupported for everything where we know that it doesn't work and unknown which can be pretty much any of them but more often than not plays well.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    No kidding. Back when the Deck was new, I played a fair amount of Cyberpunk on it and it was fiiiiine. Not good, not very good looking, but enjoyable you know? Minus the bloody text, as I had to guess what things did because a tiny font at a minuscule resolution on a small screen in red? Not exactly readable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment