you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

No, the main branch should be at HEAD, and releases ought to be a few commits back, when it was tested and considered stable enough. Maybe that’s the joke, they’re doing it at unstable points.

Main branch is a common choice for the root fork of a git development repository. It was master, but it is a poor choice when respecting freed men from slavery.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment